Curtis Armstrong: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.9%z 4.25 - 2
47.7%z 3.65 - 3
47.7%z 3.64 - 4
46.2%z 3.55 - 5
45%z 3.47 - 6
44.6%z 3.44 - 7
43.9%z 3.40 - 8
43.8%z 3.40 - 9
43.6%z 3.38 - 10
43.4%z 3.37 - 11
43.3%z 3.36 - 12
43.3%z 3.36 - 13
43.1%z 3.35 - 14
43%z 3.34 - 15
42.5%z 3.31 - 16
41.7%z 3.26 - 17
41.4%z 3.24 - 18
41.2%z 3.23 - 19
40.4%z 3.17 - 20
40.2%z 3.16 - 21
39.6%z 3.12 - 22
39.6%z 3.12 - 23
39.5%z 3.12 - 24
39.4%z 3.11 - 25
39.2%z 3.10 - 26
38.8%z 3.07 - 27
38.5%z 3.05 - 28
38%z 3.02 - 29
38%z 3.02 - 30
37.9%z 3.01 - 31
37.8%z 3.00 - 32
37.7%z 3.00 - 33
37.3%z 2.97 - 34
37.2%z 2.97 - 35
37.1%z 2.96 - 36
37.1%z 2.96 - 37
37%z 2.96 - 38
36.9%z 2.95 - 39
36.9%z 2.94 - 40
36.9%z 2.94 - 41
36.7%z 2.93 - 42
36.5%z 2.92 - 43
36%z 2.89 - 44
35.9%z 2.88 - 45
35.9%z 2.88 - 46
35.8%z 2.88 - 47
35.7%z 2.87 - 48
35.7%z 2.87 - 49
35.7%z 2.87 - 50
35.6%z 2.86