Curtis Good: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
80.4%z 4.05 - 2
62.7%z 3.83 - 3
61.8%z 3.82 - 4
49.1%z 3.68 - 5
47.8%z 3.65 - 6
47.7%z 3.65 - 7
47.6%z 3.64 - 8
47%z 3.60 - 9
45.7%z 3.52 - 10
45.7%z 3.51 - 11
44.2%z 3.42 - 12
42.1%z 3.29 - 13
42%z 3.28 - 14
41.5%z 3.25 - 15
41.5%z 3.24 - 16
41.4%z 3.24 - 17
41.2%z 3.23 - 18
41%z 3.21 - 19
40.5%z 3.18 - 20
40.2%z 3.16 - 21
39.8%z 3.14 - 22
39.8%z 3.13 - 23
39.6%z 3.12 - 24
38.5%z 3.05 - 25
38.3%z 3.04 - 26
38.2%z 3.03 - 27
38.2%z 3.03 - 28
37.9%z 3.01 - 29
37.7%z 3.00 - 30
37.6%z 2.99 - 31
37.5%z 2.99 - 32
36.8%z 2.94 - 33
36.7%z 2.94 - 34
36.3%z 2.91 - 35
36.1%z 2.90 - 36
36%z 2.89 - 37
35.8%z 2.88 - 38
35.6%z 2.86 - 39
35.6%z 2.86 - 40
35.3%z 2.84 - 41
35%z 2.82 - 42
34.9%z 2.82 - 43
34.8%z 2.81 - 44
34.6%z 2.80 - 45
34.3%z 2.78 - 46
34.2%z 2.78 - 47
34.2%z 2.77 - 48
34.2%z 2.77 - 49
34.1%z 2.77