Dan Harmon: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
86%z 4.51 - 2
80.7%z 4.08 - 3
73.5%z 3.95 - 4
70%z 3.91 - 5
66.4%z 3.87 - 6
63.7%z 3.84 - 7
60.3%z 3.80 - 8
59%z 3.79 - 9
57.7%z 3.77 - 10
56.7%z 3.76 - 11
53.3%z 3.72 - 12
52.2%z 3.71 - 13
49.5%z 3.68 - 14
45.5%z 3.50 - 15
45.4%z 3.50 - 16
44.2%z 3.42 - 17
44.1%z 3.42 - 18
43.5%z 3.37 - 19
42.6%z 3.32 - 20
42.3%z 3.30 - 21
42.2%z 3.29 - 22
42%z 3.28 - 23
41.9%z 3.27 - 24
41.9%z 3.27 - 25
41.7%z 3.26 - 26
41.6%z 3.25 - 27
41.2%z 3.23 - 28
40.8%z 3.20 - 29
40.5%z 3.18 - 30
40%z 3.15 - 31
40%z 3.15 - 32
39.9%z 3.14 - 33
39.8%z 3.14 - 34
39.8%z 3.13 - 35
39.7%z 3.13 - 36
39.7%z 3.13 - 37
39.6%z 3.12 - 38
39.2%z 3.10 - 39
39.2%z 3.10 - 40
39.2%z 3.09 - 41
39.1%z 3.09 - 42
38.9%z 3.08 - 43
38.6%z 3.06 - 44
38.6%z 3.06 - 45
38.2%z 3.03 - 46
37.8%z 3.01 - 47
37.8%z 3.00 - 48
37.5%z 2.99 - 49
37.5%z 2.99 - 50
37.4%z 2.98