Dan Jurgens: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
91%z 5.02 - 2
82%z 4.18 - 3
54.9%z 3.74 - 4
54.3%z 3.74 - 5
51.6%z 3.71 - 6
47.8%z 3.65 - 7
47.5%z 3.63 - 8
46.4%z 3.56 - 9
44.9%z 3.47 - 10
44.8%z 3.46 - 11
44.6%z 3.45 - 12
44%z 3.41 - 13
43.8%z 3.39 - 14
43.4%z 3.37 - 15
42.9%z 3.34 - 16
42.7%z 3.33 - 17
42.5%z 3.31 - 18
41.6%z 3.25 - 19
41.5%z 3.24 - 20
41.4%z 3.24 - 21
41.1%z 3.22 - 22
40.9%z 3.21 - 23
40.6%z 3.19 - 24
40.4%z 3.17 - 25
40.3%z 3.16 - 26
40.2%z 3.16 - 27
40.2%z 3.16 - 28
40.1%z 3.15 - 29
40%z 3.15 - 30
39.9%z 3.14 - 31
39.9%z 3.14 - 32
39.9%z 3.14 - 33
39.8%z 3.14 - 34
39.8%z 3.13 - 35
39.6%z 3.12 - 36
39%z 3.08 - 37
38.9%z 3.07 - 38
38.5%z 3.05 - 39
38.4%z 3.04 - 40
38.3%z 3.04 - 41
38.3%z 3.03 - 42
38.2%z 3.03 - 43
38.1%z 3.02 - 44
37.9%z 3.01 - 45
37.8%z 3.01 - 46
37.8%z 3.00 - 47
37.7%z 3.00 - 48
37.6%z 2.99 - 49
37.5%z 2.99 - 50
37.4%z 2.98