Daniel Agger: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.9%z 4.26 - 2
82.7%z 4.24 - 3
73.6%z 3.95 - 4
65.5%z 3.86 - 5
61.4%z 3.81 - 6
58.6%z 3.78 - 7
46.9%z 3.60 - 8
44.9%z 3.46 - 9
44.7%z 3.45 - 10
44.3%z 3.43 - 11
43.9%z 3.40 - 12
43.6%z 3.38 - 13
43.3%z 3.36 - 14
43%z 3.34 - 15
42.9%z 3.34 - 16
42.8%z 3.33 - 17
42.2%z 3.29 - 18
42.2%z 3.29 - 19
42%z 3.28 - 20
41.8%z 3.26 - 21
41.6%z 3.25 - 22
40.8%z 3.20 - 23
40.7%z 3.20 - 24
40.3%z 3.17 - 25
40.3%z 3.17 - 26
40.3%z 3.17 - 27
40.1%z 3.15 - 28
40%z 3.15 - 29
39.9%z 3.14 - 30
39.8%z 3.13 - 31
39.7%z 3.13 - 32
39.7%z 3.13 - 33
39.7%z 3.13 - 34
39.5%z 3.12 - 35
39.3%z 3.11 - 36
39.2%z 3.10 - 37
39.1%z 3.09 - 38
39.1%z 3.09 - 39
39.1%z 3.09 - 40
39%z 3.08 - 41
38.9%z 3.08 - 42
38.8%z 3.07 - 43
38.8%z 3.07 - 44
38.6%z 3.06 - 45
38.3%z 3.04 - 46
37.8%z 3.00 - 47
37.7%z 3.00 - 48
37.6%z 2.99 - 49
37.5%z 2.99 - 50
37.5%z 2.99