Daniel Dahm: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
89.2%z 4.77 - 2
82.7%z 4.24 - 3
82.2%z 4.20 - 4
81.5%z 4.14 - 5
78.6%z 4.00 - 6
71.8%z 3.93 - 7
71.7%z 3.93 - 8
69.7%z 3.90 - 9
59.8%z 3.80 - 10
55.8%z 3.75 - 11
53%z 3.72 - 12
50.4%z 3.69 - 13
48.4%z 3.67 - 14
48.1%z 3.67 - 15
48%z 3.67 - 16
46.6%z 3.58 - 17
46.2%z 3.55 - 18
46.2%z 3.55 - 19
45.8%z 3.52 - 20
45.8%z 3.52 - 21
45.5%z 3.50 - 22
45.3%z 3.49 - 23
45.2%z 3.48 - 24
44.3%z 3.43 - 25
44%z 3.41 - 26
43.7%z 3.39 - 27
43.4%z 3.37 - 28
43.4%z 3.37 - 29
43.2%z 3.36 - 30
43.2%z 3.36 - 31
43%z 3.34 - 32
42.9%z 3.33 - 33
42.8%z 3.33 - 34
42.4%z 3.30 - 35
42.4%z 3.30 - 36
42.3%z 3.30 - 37
42.2%z 3.29 - 38
41.9%z 3.27 - 39
41.3%z 3.23 - 40
40.9%z 3.21 - 41
40.7%z 3.19 - 42
40.6%z 3.19 - 43
40.6%z 3.18 - 44
40.5%z 3.18 - 45
40.4%z 3.17 - 46
40.4%z 3.17 - 47
40.2%z 3.16 - 48
39.8%z 3.14 - 49
39.6%z 3.12 - 50
39.6%z 3.12