Daniel Hope: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
83.4%z 4.30 - 2
83.2%z 4.27 - 3
78.3%z 4.00 - 4
66%z 3.86 - 5
64.5%z 3.85 - 6
61.6%z 3.82 - 7
52.6%z 3.72 - 8
49.8%z 3.69 - 9
49.1%z 3.68 - 10
48.8%z 3.68 - 11
46.9%z 3.60 - 12
46.7%z 3.58 - 13
46.4%z 3.56 - 14
45.1%z 3.48 - 15
45%z 3.47 - 16
43.8%z 3.39 - 17
43.5%z 3.38 - 18
43.2%z 3.36 - 19
42.7%z 3.33 - 20
42.7%z 3.32 - 21
42.2%z 3.29 - 22
42.2%z 3.29 - 23
41.9%z 3.27 - 24
41.8%z 3.26 - 25
41.7%z 3.26 - 26
41.2%z 3.23 - 27
41.1%z 3.22 - 28
41.1%z 3.22 - 29
40.8%z 3.20 - 30
40.7%z 3.19 - 31
40.7%z 3.19 - 32
40.4%z 3.17 - 33
40.3%z 3.17 - 34
40.2%z 3.16 - 35
40.1%z 3.15 - 36
40%z 3.15 - 37
40%z 3.15 - 38
39.9%z 3.14 - 39
39.7%z 3.13 - 40
39.6%z 3.12 - 41
39.4%z 3.11 - 42
39.2%z 3.10 - 43
39.1%z 3.09 - 44
39.1%z 3.09 - 45
39%z 3.08 - 46
38.7%z 3.06 - 47
38.6%z 3.06 - 48
38.4%z 3.04 - 49
38.2%z 3.03 - 50
38.1%z 3.03