Daniela Hunger: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
89.5%z 4.79 - 2
45.7%z 3.52 - 3
45.5%z 3.51 - 4
44.7%z 3.46 - 5
44.7%z 3.45 - 6
44.3%z 3.43 - 7
44.3%z 3.42 - 8
44%z 3.41 - 9
44%z 3.40 - 10
43.4%z 3.37 - 11
43.2%z 3.36 - 12
43.1%z 3.35 - 13
42.6%z 3.32 - 14
42%z 3.28 - 15
41.3%z 3.23 - 16
41%z 3.21 - 17
40.9%z 3.20 - 18
40.7%z 3.20 - 19
40.5%z 3.18 - 20
40.4%z 3.18 - 21
40.2%z 3.16 - 22
39.9%z 3.14 - 23
39.7%z 3.13 - 24
39.6%z 3.12 - 25
39.6%z 3.12 - 26
39.5%z 3.12 - 27
39.4%z 3.11 - 28
39.3%z 3.10 - 29
39.2%z 3.09 - 30
39.1%z 3.09 - 31
38.9%z 3.08 - 32
38.8%z 3.07 - 33
38.7%z 3.06 - 34
38.4%z 3.04 - 35
38.4%z 3.04 - 36
38.3%z 3.04 - 37
37.9%z 3.01 - 38
37.7%z 3.00 - 39
37.6%z 2.99 - 40
37.6%z 2.99 - 41
37.5%z 2.99 - 42
37.2%z 2.97 - 43
37.2%z 2.97 - 44
37%z 2.95 - 45
36.8%z 2.94 - 46
36.7%z 2.93 - 47
36.6%z 2.93 - 48
36.3%z 2.91 - 49
36.2%z 2.90 - 50
36%z 2.89