Danielle Marsh: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
96.6%z 6.08 - 2
94.5%z 5.68 - 3
93.9%z 5.57 - 4
92.7%z 5.34 - 5
92.7%z 5.34 - 6
92.1%z 5.24 - 7
91.7%z 5.16 - 8
91.1%z 5.05 - 9
90.4%z 4.91 - 10
90%z 4.83 - 11
87.9%z 4.66 - 12
85.5%z 4.46 - 13
84.4%z 4.38 - 14
84.1%z 4.35 - 15
83.6%z 4.31 - 16
83%z 4.26 - 17
82.3%z 4.20 - 18
82%z 4.18 - 19
81.9%z 4.17 - 20
81.6%z 4.14 - 21
81.3%z 4.12 - 22
81%z 4.10 - 23
80.8%z 4.09 - 24
80%z 4.02 - 25
77.1%z 3.98 - 26
76.9%z 3.98 - 27
76.2%z 3.98 - 28
73.4%z 3.94 - 29
68.5%z 3.89 - 30
66.5%z 3.87 - 31
62.2%z 3.82 - 32
61.9%z 3.82 - 33
61.1%z 3.81 - 34
61%z 3.81 - 35
58.7%z 3.78 - 36
57.7%z 3.77 - 37
56%z 3.75 - 38
54%z 3.73 - 39
53.4%z 3.73 - 40
53.2%z 3.72 - 41
52.3%z 3.71 - 42
51.4%z 3.70 - 43
50.6%z 3.70 - 44
50.5%z 3.69 - 45
49.8%z 3.69 - 46
49.3%z 3.68 - 47
48.4%z 3.67 - 48
47.9%z 3.66 - 49
47.6%z 3.64 - 50
47.6%z 3.64