Danielle Waterman: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
99%z 14.46 - 2
92%z 5.20 - 3
91.6%z 5.14 - 4
91.2%z 5.06 - 5
91%z 5.02 - 6
90.7%z 4.96 - 7
90.4%z 4.91 - 8
87.7%z 4.65 - 9
85.9%z 4.50 - 10
85.7%z 4.48 - 11
85.3%z 4.45 - 12
84.5%z 4.39 - 13
84.4%z 4.38 - 14
82.7%z 4.24 - 15
82.6%z 4.23 - 16
82.5%z 4.22 - 17
82.3%z 4.20 - 18
80.9%z 4.09 - 19
80.8%z 4.08 - 20
80.4%z 4.05 - 21
80.3%z 4.04 - 22
80.1%z 4.03 - 23
79.8%z 4.01 - 24
79.8%z 4.01 - 25
79.7%z 4.01 - 26
76.7%z 3.98 - 27
73%z 3.94 - 28
71.7%z 3.93 - 29
70.5%z 3.91 - 30
68.5%z 3.89 - 31
68.1%z 3.89 - 32
64.8%z 3.85 - 33
64.7%z 3.85 - 34
64.5%z 3.85 - 35
62.4%z 3.82 - 36
59%z 3.79 - 37
56.7%z 3.76 - 38
52.6%z 3.72 - 39
52.1%z 3.71 - 40
51.4%z 3.70 - 41
51.3%z 3.70 - 42
47.5%z 3.64 - 43
47.5%z 3.64 - 44
47.4%z 3.63 - 45
47.3%z 3.62 - 46
47.3%z 3.62 - 47
47.2%z 3.62 - 48
47.2%z 3.62 - 49
47.1%z 3.61 - 50
47.1%z 3.61