Dante Lam: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.8%z 4.65 - 2
83.8%z 4.33 - 3
80.3%z 4.04 - 4
66.5%z 3.87 - 5
66.2%z 3.87 - 6
47%z 3.60 - 7
46.7%z 3.58 - 8
46.5%z 3.57 - 9
46.3%z 3.56 - 10
45.9%z 3.53 - 11
45.5%z 3.50 - 12
45.4%z 3.50 - 13
45.2%z 3.48 - 14
43.8%z 3.39 - 15
43.7%z 3.39 - 16
43.4%z 3.37 - 17
42.9%z 3.34 - 18
42.2%z 3.29 - 19
42.1%z 3.28 - 20
41.7%z 3.26 - 21
41.4%z 3.24 - 22
41.3%z 3.23 - 23
41.1%z 3.22 - 24
41%z 3.21 - 25
40.9%z 3.20 - 26
40.6%z 3.19 - 27
40.3%z 3.17 - 28
40.3%z 3.16 - 29
40.2%z 3.16 - 30
39.6%z 3.12 - 31
39.4%z 3.11 - 32
39.3%z 3.10 - 33
39.2%z 3.10 - 34
39%z 3.08 - 35
38.9%z 3.07 - 36
38.9%z 3.07 - 37
38.8%z 3.07 - 38
37.9%z 3.01 - 39
37.8%z 3.01 - 40
37.8%z 3.00 - 41
37.7%z 3.00 - 42
37.3%z 2.97 - 43
37.2%z 2.97 - 44
37.1%z 2.96 - 45
37%z 2.95 - 46
36.8%z 2.94 - 47
36.8%z 2.94 - 48
36.6%z 2.93 - 49
36.5%z 2.92 - 50
36.1%z 2.90