Dave Canterbury: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
84.4%z 4.37 - 2
81.5%z 4.14 - 3
80.9%z 4.09 - 4
66.9%z 3.87 - 5
51.4%z 3.70 - 6
49%z 3.68 - 7
48.8%z 3.68 - 8
48.4%z 3.67 - 9
46.1%z 3.54 - 10
45.2%z 3.49 - 11
45.2%z 3.49 - 12
45.1%z 3.48 - 13
45%z 3.47 - 14
44.9%z 3.47 - 15
44.5%z 3.44 - 16
43.7%z 3.39 - 17
43.4%z 3.37 - 18
43.4%z 3.37 - 19
43.2%z 3.36 - 20
43.1%z 3.35 - 21
42.9%z 3.33 - 22
42.5%z 3.31 - 23
42.4%z 3.31 - 24
42.3%z 3.29 - 25
42%z 3.28 - 26
41.8%z 3.27 - 27
41.4%z 3.24 - 28
40.8%z 3.20 - 29
40.5%z 3.18 - 30
40%z 3.15 - 31
39.9%z 3.14 - 32
39.7%z 3.13 - 33
39.5%z 3.12 - 34
39.4%z 3.11 - 35
39.2%z 3.09 - 36
39%z 3.08 - 37
38.7%z 3.06 - 38
38.7%z 3.06 - 39
38.6%z 3.06 - 40
38.2%z 3.03 - 41
38.1%z 3.03 - 42
38.1%z 3.03 - 43
37.9%z 3.01 - 44
37.7%z 3.00 - 45
37.7%z 3.00 - 46
37.6%z 2.99 - 47
37.2%z 2.96 - 48
37%z 2.96 - 49
37%z 2.95 - 50
37%z 2.95