David Adger: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
92.8%z 5.37 - 2
89.9%z 4.83 - 3
85.7%z 4.48 - 4
77.8%z 3.99 - 5
73.2%z 3.94 - 6
63%z 3.83 - 7
61.2%z 3.81 - 8
49.1%z 3.68 - 9
47.2%z 3.61 - 10
47.1%z 3.61 - 11
46.2%z 3.55 - 12
44.4%z 3.43 - 13
43.8%z 3.39 - 14
43.4%z 3.37 - 15
43.3%z 3.36 - 16
43.2%z 3.36 - 17
42.4%z 3.30 - 18
41.7%z 3.26 - 19
41.5%z 3.25 - 20
40.8%z 3.20 - 21
40.8%z 3.20 - 22
40.7%z 3.19 - 23
40.2%z 3.16 - 24
40.2%z 3.16 - 25
40.1%z 3.16 - 26
40.1%z 3.15 - 27
39.8%z 3.13 - 28
39.5%z 3.12 - 29
39.5%z 3.11 - 30
39.4%z 3.11 - 31
39.3%z 3.11 - 32
39.1%z 3.09 - 33
39.1%z 3.09 - 34
38.9%z 3.08 - 35
38.8%z 3.07 - 36
38.7%z 3.06 - 37
38.7%z 3.06 - 38
38.6%z 3.06 - 39
38.6%z 3.06 - 40
38.4%z 3.05 - 41
38.3%z 3.04 - 42
38.1%z 3.02 - 43
38%z 3.02 - 44
37.7%z 3.00 - 45
37.7%z 3.00 - 46
37.7%z 3.00 - 47
37.6%z 2.99 - 48
37.6%z 2.99 - 49
37.5%z 2.98 - 50
37.4%z 2.98