David Armstrong-Jones: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
88.3%z 4.70 - 2
83.1%z 4.27 - 3
81%z 4.10 - 4
59.7%z 3.79 - 5
55.7%z 3.75 - 6
46.9%z 3.60 - 7
46.5%z 3.57 - 8
45.8%z 3.53 - 9
44.5%z 3.44 - 10
43.1%z 3.35 - 11
43%z 3.34 - 12
42.9%z 3.34 - 13
42.9%z 3.34 - 14
42.9%z 3.34 - 15
42.8%z 3.33 - 16
42.4%z 3.31 - 17
41.9%z 3.27 - 18
41.8%z 3.26 - 19
41.7%z 3.26 - 20
41.7%z 3.26 - 21
41.2%z 3.23 - 22
40.9%z 3.20 - 23
40.8%z 3.20 - 24
40.8%z 3.20 - 25
40.7%z 3.19 - 26
40.5%z 3.18 - 27
40.4%z 3.18 - 28
40.4%z 3.17 - 29
40.1%z 3.15 - 30
39.8%z 3.13 - 31
39.7%z 3.13 - 32
39.2%z 3.09 - 33
38.6%z 3.06 - 34
38.4%z 3.05 - 35
38.4%z 3.04 - 36
38%z 3.02 - 37
38%z 3.02 - 38
37.8%z 3.00 - 39
37.7%z 3.00 - 40
37.7%z 3.00 - 41
37.6%z 2.99 - 42
37.5%z 2.99 - 43
37.3%z 2.97 - 44
37.1%z 2.96 - 45
36.8%z 2.94 - 46
36.7%z 2.94 - 47
36.6%z 2.93 - 48
36.6%z 2.93 - 49
36.5%z 2.92 - 50
36.5%z 2.92