David Di Tommaso: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.1%z 4.19 - 2
78.5%z 4.00 - 3
51.7%z 3.71 - 4
47.5%z 3.64 - 5
46.2%z 3.55 - 6
46%z 3.54 - 7
45%z 3.47 - 8
44.4%z 3.44 - 9
44.2%z 3.42 - 10
43.3%z 3.37 - 11
43.3%z 3.36 - 12
42.3%z 3.30 - 13
42.1%z 3.28 - 14
41.8%z 3.26 - 15
41.7%z 3.26 - 16
41.6%z 3.25 - 17
41.1%z 3.22 - 18
40.3%z 3.17 - 19
39.9%z 3.14 - 20
39.9%z 3.14 - 21
39.8%z 3.13 - 22
39.5%z 3.12 - 23
39.5%z 3.11 - 24
39.4%z 3.11 - 25
39.3%z 3.10 - 26
39%z 3.08 - 27
38.7%z 3.06 - 28
38.4%z 3.04 - 29
37.9%z 3.01 - 30
37.5%z 2.98 - 31
37.2%z 2.96 - 32
37%z 2.95 - 33
36.5%z 2.92 - 34
36.2%z 2.90 - 35
36.2%z 2.90 - 36
36.1%z 2.90 - 37
36%z 2.89 - 38
35.7%z 2.87 - 39
35.7%z 2.87 - 40
35.7%z 2.87 - 41
35.5%z 2.86 - 42
35.1%z 2.83 - 43
35.1%z 2.83 - 44
34.6%z 2.80 - 45
34.5%z 2.79 - 46
34.4%z 2.79 - 47
34.4%z 2.78 - 48
34.3%z 2.78 - 49
34.3%z 2.78