David E. Sanger: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
73.1%z 3.94 - 2
71.5%z 3.92 - 3
59.3%z 3.79 - 4
48%z 3.67 - 5
46.2%z 3.55 - 6
45%z 3.47 - 7
44.7%z 3.45 - 8
44.6%z 3.45 - 9
44.5%z 3.44 - 10
44.4%z 3.43 - 11
44.1%z 3.41 - 12
43.9%z 3.40 - 13
43.8%z 3.40 - 14
43.4%z 3.37 - 15
42.9%z 3.34 - 16
42.8%z 3.33 - 17
42.6%z 3.32 - 18
42.5%z 3.31 - 19
42.3%z 3.30 - 20
41.7%z 3.26 - 21
41.5%z 3.25 - 22
41.4%z 3.24 - 23
41.1%z 3.22 - 24
40.3%z 3.17 - 25
40.3%z 3.16 - 26
39.6%z 3.12 - 27
39.1%z 3.09 - 28
38.8%z 3.07 - 29
38.7%z 3.07 - 30
38.6%z 3.06 - 31
38.5%z 3.05 - 32
37.9%z 3.01 - 33
37.9%z 3.01 - 34
37.8%z 3.01 - 35
37.8%z 3.00 - 36
37.5%z 2.99 - 37
37.2%z 2.96 - 38
36.9%z 2.95 - 39
36.7%z 2.94 - 40
36.6%z 2.93 - 41
36.5%z 2.92 - 42
36.5%z 2.92 - 43
36.4%z 2.92 - 44
36.4%z 2.92 - 45
36.3%z 2.91 - 46
36.2%z 2.90 - 47
36.2%z 2.90 - 48
36.1%z 2.90 - 49
36.1%z 2.89 - 50
36%z 2.89