David Furnish: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.7%z 4.24 - 2
71%z 3.92 - 3
58.2%z 3.78 - 4
58.1%z 3.78 - 5
55.2%z 3.75 - 6
54.8%z 3.74 - 7
49.5%z 3.68 - 8
47.1%z 3.61 - 9
46.3%z 3.56 - 10
46%z 3.54 - 11
45.8%z 3.52 - 12
45.8%z 3.52 - 13
45.4%z 3.50 - 14
45.3%z 3.49 - 15
45%z 3.47 - 16
44.2%z 3.42 - 17
44%z 3.41 - 18
43.6%z 3.38 - 19
42.7%z 3.32 - 20
42.7%z 3.32 - 21
42.5%z 3.31 - 22
42.4%z 3.31 - 23
42%z 3.28 - 24
41.9%z 3.27 - 25
41.9%z 3.27 - 26
41.2%z 3.23 - 27
41.2%z 3.22 - 28
40.8%z 3.20 - 29
40.8%z 3.20 - 30
40.6%z 3.19 - 31
40.4%z 3.17 - 32
39.9%z 3.14 - 33
39.9%z 3.14 - 34
39.8%z 3.13 - 35
39.5%z 3.12 - 36
39.5%z 3.12 - 37
38.9%z 3.08 - 38
38.9%z 3.07 - 39
38.8%z 3.07 - 40
38.8%z 3.07 - 41
38.8%z 3.07 - 42
38.7%z 3.07 - 43
38.7%z 3.07 - 44
38.7%z 3.06 - 45
38.4%z 3.04 - 46
38.4%z 3.04 - 47
38.3%z 3.04 - 48
38%z 3.02 - 49
37.9%z 3.01 - 50
37.9%z 3.01