David Graeber: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
85.9%z 4.50 - 2
84.7%z 4.40 - 3
80.8%z 4.08 - 4
59.9%z 3.80 - 5
56.5%z 3.76 - 6
52.3%z 3.71 - 7
52.2%z 3.71 - 8
52.2%z 3.71 - 9
47.1%z 3.61 - 10
47.1%z 3.61 - 11
45.9%z 3.53 - 12
45.5%z 3.50 - 13
45%z 3.47 - 14
44.7%z 3.45 - 15
44.5%z 3.44 - 16
44.4%z 3.44 - 17
44.2%z 3.42 - 18
43.5%z 3.38 - 19
43.4%z 3.37 - 20
43.2%z 3.36 - 21
43.1%z 3.35 - 22
42.9%z 3.34 - 23
42.9%z 3.34 - 24
42.5%z 3.31 - 25
42.3%z 3.30 - 26
41.9%z 3.27 - 27
41.8%z 3.26 - 28
41.7%z 3.26 - 29
41.6%z 3.25 - 30
41.6%z 3.25 - 31
41.3%z 3.23 - 32
41%z 3.21 - 33
40.9%z 3.21 - 34
40.6%z 3.19 - 35
40.5%z 3.18 - 36
40.4%z 3.17 - 37
40.2%z 3.16 - 38
40.2%z 3.16 - 39
40.1%z 3.16 - 40
39.8%z 3.14 - 41
39.7%z 3.13 - 42
39.6%z 3.12 - 43
39.4%z 3.11 - 44
39.3%z 3.10 - 45
39.2%z 3.10 - 46
39%z 3.08 - 47
39%z 3.08 - 48
39%z 3.08 - 49
38.9%z 3.08 - 50
38.9%z 3.08