David Hoberman: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81%z 4.10 - 2
48%z 3.66 - 3
47.2%z 3.61 - 4
46.5%z 3.57 - 5
45.8%z 3.53 - 6
45%z 3.47 - 7
44.9%z 3.47 - 8
44.2%z 3.42 - 9
44.1%z 3.41 - 10
43.9%z 3.40 - 11
43.8%z 3.40 - 12
43.1%z 3.35 - 13
43%z 3.35 - 14
42.9%z 3.34 - 15
42.5%z 3.31 - 16
42.4%z 3.30 - 17
42.1%z 3.29 - 18
42.1%z 3.28 - 19
41.9%z 3.27 - 20
41.8%z 3.27 - 21
41.6%z 3.25 - 22
40.9%z 3.21 - 23
40.9%z 3.21 - 24
40.9%z 3.20 - 25
40.9%z 3.20 - 26
40.7%z 3.19 - 27
40.7%z 3.19 - 28
40.6%z 3.19 - 29
40.6%z 3.19 - 30
40.6%z 3.18 - 31
40.3%z 3.17 - 32
40%z 3.14 - 33
39.8%z 3.14 - 34
39.6%z 3.12 - 35
39.5%z 3.12 - 36
39.3%z 3.10 - 37
39.2%z 3.10 - 38
39%z 3.09 - 39
39%z 3.08 - 40
38.8%z 3.07 - 41
38.6%z 3.06 - 42
38.3%z 3.03 - 43
38.2%z 3.03 - 44
38.2%z 3.03 - 45
38.1%z 3.03 - 46
38.1%z 3.03 - 47
38%z 3.02 - 48
38%z 3.02 - 49
38%z 3.02 - 50
37.8%z 3.01