David Hogg: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
90.8%z 4.98 - 2
84%z 4.34 - 3
83.5%z 4.30 - 4
82.9%z 4.25 - 5
81.1%z 4.11 - 6
77%z 3.98 - 7
72.9%z 3.94 - 8
71.8%z 3.93 - 9
69.2%z 3.90 - 10
54.7%z 3.74 - 11
49.3%z 3.68 - 12
49.1%z 3.68 - 13
47%z 3.60 - 14
46.3%z 3.56 - 15
45.9%z 3.53 - 16
45.8%z 3.52 - 17
45.5%z 3.51 - 18
45.2%z 3.49 - 19
45%z 3.47 - 20
44.3%z 3.43 - 21
44.2%z 3.42 - 22
43.9%z 3.40 - 23
43.8%z 3.40 - 24
43.6%z 3.38 - 25
43.5%z 3.37 - 26
43.4%z 3.37 - 27
43.3%z 3.36 - 28
42.7%z 3.32 - 29
42.5%z 3.31 - 30
42.1%z 3.28 - 31
42%z 3.28 - 32
41.9%z 3.27 - 33
41.7%z 3.26 - 34
41.2%z 3.23 - 35
40.9%z 3.21 - 36
40.9%z 3.21 - 37
40.9%z 3.21 - 38
40.9%z 3.21 - 39
40.8%z 3.20 - 40
40.7%z 3.19 - 41
40.4%z 3.18 - 42
40.4%z 3.17 - 43
39.9%z 3.14 - 44
39.6%z 3.12 - 45
39.5%z 3.12 - 46
39.5%z 3.12 - 47
39.3%z 3.11 - 48
38.8%z 3.07 - 49
38.8%z 3.07 - 50
38.6%z 3.06