David Lander: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
88.3%z 4.69 - 2
83.9%z 4.33 - 3
83.5%z 4.30 - 4
82.1%z 4.19 - 5
76.8%z 3.98 - 6
75.5%z 3.97 - 7
70.6%z 3.91 - 8
69.7%z 3.90 - 9
66.5%z 3.87 - 10
65.2%z 3.85 - 11
50.3%z 3.69 - 12
47.7%z 3.65 - 13
47.5%z 3.64 - 14
47.2%z 3.62 - 15
47.1%z 3.61 - 1646.6%z 3.58
- 17
46.3%z 3.56 - 18
46.3%z 3.55 - 19
45.9%z 3.53 - 20
45.5%z 3.50 - 21
44.8%z 3.46 - 22
44.7%z 3.45 - 23
44.5%z 3.44 - 24
44.5%z 3.44 - 25
44.4%z 3.43 - 26
44.3%z 3.42 - 27
44%z 3.41 - 28
43.9%z 3.40 - 29
43.9%z 3.40 - 30
43.3%z 3.36 - 31
43.2%z 3.36 - 32
43.1%z 3.35 - 33
43.1%z 3.35 - 34
43.1%z 3.35 - 35
42.9%z 3.34 - 36
42.9%z 3.34 - 37
42.8%z 3.33 - 38
42.8%z 3.33 - 39
42.5%z 3.31 - 40
42.5%z 3.31 - 41
42.4%z 3.30 - 42
42.3%z 3.30 - 43
42.2%z 3.29 - 44
42.1%z 3.28 - 45
41.7%z 3.26 - 46
41.6%z 3.25 - 47
41.5%z 3.25 - 48
41.4%z 3.24 - 49
41.3%z 3.23 - 50
41.2%z 3.23