David Tibet: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
90.1%z 4.85 - 2
88.9%z 4.74 - 3
84.4%z 4.38 - 4
81.3%z 4.13 - 5
68.1%z 3.89 - 6
64.3%z 3.85 - 7
53%z 3.72 - 8
51.1%z 3.70 - 9
47.7%z 3.65 - 10
47.7%z 3.65 - 11
47.4%z 3.63 - 12
45.6%z 3.51 - 13
45.3%z 3.49 - 14
44.9%z 3.47 - 15
44.9%z 3.46 - 16
44.8%z 3.46 - 17
44.5%z 3.44 - 18
44.4%z 3.43 - 19
44.2%z 3.42 - 20
42.7%z 3.32 - 21
41.9%z 3.27 - 22
41.3%z 3.23 - 23
40.8%z 3.20 - 24
40.4%z 3.17 - 25
40%z 3.15 - 26
39.8%z 3.14 - 27
39.8%z 3.13 - 28
39.6%z 3.12 - 29
39.5%z 3.11 - 30
39.4%z 3.11 - 31
39.1%z 3.09 - 32
38.9%z 3.08 - 33
38.7%z 3.06 - 34
38.4%z 3.05 - 35
38.4%z 3.05 - 36
38.1%z 3.03 - 37
38.1%z 3.03 - 38
38.1%z 3.02 - 39
37.9%z 3.01 - 40
37.7%z 3.00 - 41
37.6%z 2.99 - 42
37.5%z 2.99 - 43
37.5%z 2.99 - 44
37.5%z 2.98 - 45
37.2%z 2.97 - 46
37.1%z 2.96 - 47
37.1%z 2.96 - 48
37.1%z 2.96 - 49
37.1%z 2.96 - 50
37%z 2.95