Diane Ackerman: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.2%z 4.60 - 2
86.3%z 4.53 - 3
82.4%z 4.21 - 4
80.8%z 4.09 - 5
51.1%z 3.70 - 6
50.3%z 3.69 - 7
45.4%z 3.50 - 8
45.3%z 3.49 - 9
44.3%z 3.42 - 10
44.2%z 3.42 - 11
43.7%z 3.39 - 12
43%z 3.34 - 13
42.9%z 3.34 - 14
42.8%z 3.33 - 15
42.8%z 3.33 - 16
42.6%z 3.32 - 17
42.3%z 3.30 - 18
42.3%z 3.29 - 19
42.3%z 3.29 - 20
41.9%z 3.27 - 21
41.9%z 3.27 - 22
41.7%z 3.26 - 23
41.1%z 3.22 - 24
40.7%z 3.19 - 25
40.7%z 3.19 - 26
40.6%z 3.19 - 27
40.4%z 3.18 - 28
40.3%z 3.17 - 29
40.1%z 3.16 - 30
40%z 3.15 - 31
39.7%z 3.13 - 32
39.6%z 3.12 - 33
39.5%z 3.12 - 34
38.6%z 3.06 - 35
38.4%z 3.04 - 36
38.2%z 3.03 - 37
38%z 3.02 - 38
38%z 3.02 - 39
37.9%z 3.01 - 40
37.8%z 3.01 - 41
37.7%z 3.00 - 42
37.7%z 3.00 - 43
37.5%z 2.99 - 44
37.4%z 2.98 - 45
37.4%z 2.98 - 46
37.3%z 2.98 - 47
37.3%z 2.98 - 48
37%z 2.95 - 49
36.8%z 2.94 - 50
36.8%z 2.94