Dieter Burdenski: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.4%z 4.21 - 2
81.5%z 4.14 - 3
80.4%z 4.05 - 4
78.4%z 4.00 - 5
78.3%z 4.00 - 6
68.6%z 3.89 - 7
65.9%z 3.86 - 8
62.8%z 3.83 - 9
58.2%z 3.78 - 10
53.7%z 3.73 - 11
47.9%z 3.66 - 12
47.6%z 3.64 - 13
47.1%z 3.61 - 14
47%z 3.60 - 15
46.9%z 3.59 - 16
46.8%z 3.59 - 17
45.5%z 3.50 - 18
45.1%z 3.48 - 19
45%z 3.47 - 20
44.7%z 3.45 - 21
44.6%z 3.44 - 22
44.2%z 3.42 - 23
43.1%z 3.35 - 24
43%z 3.34 - 25
42.9%z 3.33 - 26
42.7%z 3.33 - 27
42.7%z 3.32 - 28
42.6%z 3.31 - 29
42.4%z 3.30 - 30
42.2%z 3.29 - 31
42.2%z 3.29 - 32
42.1%z 3.28 - 33
42%z 3.28 - 34
42%z 3.28 - 35
41.9%z 3.27 - 36
41.4%z 3.24 - 37
40.5%z 3.18 - 38
40.4%z 3.17 - 39
40.3%z 3.17 - 40
40.3%z 3.17 - 41
40.3%z 3.17 - 42
40.2%z 3.16 - 43
40.2%z 3.16 - 44
40.2%z 3.16 - 45
40.1%z 3.16 - 46
40.1%z 3.15 - 47
40.1%z 3.15 - 48
39.6%z 3.12 - 49
39.4%z 3.11