Dilber Ay: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
85.2%z 4.44 - 2
82%z 4.18 - 3
81.2%z 4.11 - 4
73.8%z 3.95 - 5
60.5%z 3.80 - 6
57.2%z 3.77 - 7
52.9%z 3.72 - 8
47.9%z 3.66 - 9
47.1%z 3.61 - 10
46.2%z 3.55 - 11
45.3%z 3.49 - 12
45.1%z 3.48 - 13
45.1%z 3.48 - 14
45%z 3.47 - 15
45%z 3.47 - 16
44.3%z 3.43 - 17
44.3%z 3.42 - 18
43.8%z 3.39 - 19
42.9%z 3.34 - 20
42.3%z 3.30 - 21
41.9%z 3.27 - 22
41.7%z 3.26 - 23
41.6%z 3.25 - 24
41.6%z 3.25 - 25
41.1%z 3.22 - 26
41.1%z 3.22 - 27
41%z 3.21 - 28
40.8%z 3.20 - 29
40.6%z 3.19 - 30
40.5%z 3.18 - 31
40.2%z 3.16 - 32
40.2%z 3.16 - 33
39.7%z 3.13 - 34
39.7%z 3.13 - 35
39.5%z 3.12 - 36
39.4%z 3.11 - 37
39.1%z 3.09 - 38
39%z 3.08 - 39
38.8%z 3.07 - 40
38.6%z 3.06 - 41
38.5%z 3.05 - 42
38.5%z 3.05 - 43
38.2%z 3.03 - 44
38%z 3.02 - 45
37.9%z 3.01 - 46
37.7%z 3.00 - 47
37.7%z 3.00 - 48
37.6%z 2.99 - 49
37.5%z 2.99 - 50
37.5%z 2.99