George Leo Thomas: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
84.6%z 4.39 - 2
82.1%z 4.19 - 3
74.9%z 3.96 - 4
72.7%z 3.94 - 5
63.3%z 3.83 - 6
57.5%z 3.77 - 7
56.9%z 3.76 - 8
56.2%z 3.76 - 9
55.4%z 3.75 - 10
52.8%z 3.72 - 11
52.7%z 3.72 - 12
51.4%z 3.70 - 13
45.2%z 3.49 - 14
44.8%z 3.46 - 15
44.6%z 3.45 - 16
44.1%z 3.42 - 17
43.3%z 3.36 - 18
43.3%z 3.36 - 19
43%z 3.34 - 20
42.7%z 3.33 - 21
42.7%z 3.32 - 22
42.6%z 3.32 - 23
42.4%z 3.30 - 24
41.4%z 3.24 - 25
41.2%z 3.23 - 26
41.2%z 3.23 - 27
41.2%z 3.22 - 28
40.7%z 3.19 - 29
40.2%z 3.16 - 30
39.8%z 3.13 - 31
39.5%z 3.12 - 32
39.3%z 3.10 - 33
39.3%z 3.10 - 34
39.3%z 3.10 - 35
39.1%z 3.09 - 36
39%z 3.09 - 37
38.8%z 3.07 - 38
38.6%z 3.05 - 39
38.3%z 3.04 - 40
38.2%z 3.03 - 41
38.2%z 3.03 - 42
37.8%z 3.01 - 43
37.4%z 2.98 - 44
37.2%z 2.97 - 45
36.9%z 2.95 - 46
36.8%z 2.94 - 47
36.6%z 2.93 - 48
36%z 2.89 - 49
36%z 2.89 - 50
35.9%z 2.88