Gijs Naber: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81.3%z 4.12 - 2
58.8%z 3.78 - 3
52.3%z 3.71 - 4
50.7%z 3.70 - 5
49.4%z 3.68 - 6
47%z 3.60 - 7
46.9%z 3.60 - 8
45.2%z 3.49 - 9
45.1%z 3.48 - 10
44.4%z 3.44 - 11
44%z 3.41 - 12
42.6%z 3.31 - 13
42.2%z 3.29 - 14
42.1%z 3.29 - 15
42.1%z 3.28 - 16
42%z 3.28 - 17
41.5%z 3.24 - 18
40.8%z 3.20 - 19
40.7%z 3.19 - 20
40.6%z 3.19 - 21
40.5%z 3.18 - 22
40.5%z 3.18 - 23
40.4%z 3.17 - 24
40.3%z 3.17 - 25
40.2%z 3.16 - 26
40.2%z 3.16 - 27
39.6%z 3.12 - 28
39.6%z 3.12 - 29
39.5%z 3.12 - 30
39.2%z 3.10 - 31
39%z 3.08 - 32
39%z 3.08 - 33
38.8%z 3.07 - 34
38.8%z 3.07 - 35
38.7%z 3.07 - 36
38.4%z 3.05 - 37
38.4%z 3.05 - 38
38.4%z 3.04 - 39
38.3%z 3.04 - 40
38.3%z 3.04 - 41
38.2%z 3.03 - 42
38.2%z 3.03 - 43
38.1%z 3.03 - 44
38%z 3.02 - 45
37.8%z 3.01 - 46
37.7%z 3.00 - 47
37.7%z 3.00 - 48
37.4%z 2.98 - 49
37.3%z 2.98 - 50
37.2%z 2.96