Gil Birmingham: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
91.2%z 5.06 - 2
87.6%z 4.64 - 3
81.6%z 4.15 - 4
80.4%z 4.05 - 5
67.3%z 3.88 - 6
57.4%z 3.77 - 7
52.2%z 3.71 - 8
52%z 3.71 - 9
51.1%z 3.70 - 10
47.4%z 3.63 - 11
47.2%z 3.62 - 12
46.9%z 3.60 - 13
46.3%z 3.56 - 14
46.1%z 3.54 - 15
46%z 3.54 - 16
45.8%z 3.53 - 17
45.3%z 3.49 - 18
44.7%z 3.45 - 19
43.9%z 3.40 - 20
43.6%z 3.38 - 21
43.5%z 3.38 - 22
43.3%z 3.36 - 23
43.2%z 3.36 - 24
43.2%z 3.36 - 25
42.6%z 3.31 - 26
42.6%z 3.31 - 27
41.9%z 3.27 - 28
41.8%z 3.26 - 29
41.7%z 3.26 - 30
41.6%z 3.25 - 31
41.6%z 3.25 - 32
41.5%z 3.25 - 33
41.3%z 3.23 - 34
41.2%z 3.22 - 35
41.2%z 3.22 - 36
40.9%z 3.20 - 37
40.7%z 3.19 - 38
40.7%z 3.19 - 39
40.7%z 3.19 - 40
40.5%z 3.18 - 41
40.2%z 3.16 - 42
40.2%z 3.16 - 43
39.9%z 3.14 - 44
39.8%z 3.13 - 45
39.6%z 3.12 - 46
39.5%z 3.12 - 47
39.3%z 3.10 - 48
39.2%z 3.10 - 49
39.2%z 3.10 - 50
39.2%z 3.10