Girish Oak: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.9%z 4.25 - 2
80.1%z 4.02 - 3
47.4%z 3.63 - 4
47.1%z 3.61 - 5
45.6%z 3.51 - 6
45%z 3.47 - 7
44.5%z 3.44 - 8
43.8%z 3.40 - 9
42.8%z 3.33 - 10
42.6%z 3.32 - 11
42.3%z 3.30 - 12
42%z 3.28 - 13
42%z 3.28 - 14
41.5%z 3.24 - 15
41.5%z 3.24 - 16
41.2%z 3.22 - 17
41%z 3.21 - 18
40.5%z 3.18 - 19
39.6%z 3.12 - 20
39.4%z 3.11 - 21
39.2%z 3.10 - 22
39.1%z 3.09 - 23
39.1%z 3.09 - 24
39.1%z 3.09 - 25
38.8%z 3.07 - 26
38.6%z 3.06 - 27
38.6%z 3.05 - 28
38.3%z 3.04 - 29
38.2%z 3.03 - 30
38.1%z 3.03 - 31
38%z 3.02 - 32
37.8%z 3.01 - 33
37%z 2.95 - 34
36.6%z 2.93 - 35
36.6%z 2.93 - 36
36.6%z 2.93 - 37
36.5%z 2.92 - 38
36.4%z 2.91 - 39
36.3%z 2.91 - 40
36.3%z 2.91 - 41
36.3%z 2.91 - 42
35.9%z 2.88 - 43
35.9%z 2.88 - 44
35.7%z 2.87 - 45
35.7%z 2.87 - 46
35.6%z 2.87 - 47
35.6%z 2.86 - 48
35.6%z 2.86 - 49
35.5%z 2.85 - 50
35.3%z 2.84