Graham Harman: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
86.4%z 4.54 - 2
76.5%z 3.98 - 3
64.6%z 3.85 - 4
61%z 3.81 - 5
59.7%z 3.79 - 6
54.8%z 3.74 - 7
50.8%z 3.70 - 8
50%z 3.69 - 9
49.6%z 3.68 - 10
47.4%z 3.63 - 11
45.3%z 3.49 - 12
45%z 3.47 - 13
44.6%z 3.45 - 14
44.5%z 3.44 - 15
44.4%z 3.43 - 16
42.9%z 3.33 - 17
42.9%z 3.33 - 18
42.5%z 3.31 - 19
42.4%z 3.31 - 20
42.3%z 3.29 - 21
41.8%z 3.26 - 22
40.9%z 3.21 - 23
40.6%z 3.19 - 24
40.4%z 3.18 - 25
40.1%z 3.15 - 26
39.9%z 3.14 - 27
39.8%z 3.14 - 28
39.8%z 3.13 - 29
39.5%z 3.11 - 30
38.9%z 3.07 - 31
38.8%z 3.07 - 32
38.7%z 3.06 - 33
38.5%z 3.05 - 34
38.3%z 3.04 - 35
37.3%z 2.97 - 36
37.1%z 2.96 - 37
36.9%z 2.95 - 38
36.9%z 2.95 - 39
36.9%z 2.95 - 40
36.8%z 2.94 - 41
36.7%z 2.93 - 42
36.7%z 2.93 - 43
36.6%z 2.93 - 44
36.1%z 2.90 - 45
36.1%z 2.90 - 46
36.1%z 2.89 - 47
36%z 2.89 - 48
35.6%z 2.86 - 49
35.6%z 2.86 - 50
35.6%z 2.86