Graham Vick: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
78.1%z 4.00 - 2
76.4%z 3.98 - 3
72.7%z 3.94 - 4
71.9%z 3.93 - 5
70.5%z 3.91 - 6
69.6%z 3.90 - 7
66.9%z 3.87 - 8
64.2%z 3.84 - 9
64%z 3.84 - 10
57.6%z 3.77 - 11
50.3%z 3.69 - 12
47.8%z 3.65 - 13
47.8%z 3.65 - 14
47.6%z 3.64 - 15
47.5%z 3.63 - 16
47.4%z 3.63 - 17
47%z 3.60 - 18
46.4%z 3.57 - 19
46.2%z 3.55 - 20
46.1%z 3.54 - 21
45.8%z 3.52 - 22
45.6%z 3.51 - 23
45.3%z 3.49 - 24
44.9%z 3.46 - 25
44.5%z 3.44 - 26
44%z 3.41 - 27
43.9%z 3.40 - 28
43.9%z 3.40 - 29
43.9%z 3.40 - 30
43.7%z 3.39 - 31
43.6%z 3.38 - 32
43.5%z 3.37 - 33
43.3%z 3.37 - 34
43.2%z 3.36 - 35
42.9%z 3.34 - 36
42.9%z 3.33 - 37
42.6%z 3.32 - 38
42.1%z 3.29 - 39
42.1%z 3.28 - 40
42%z 3.28 - 41
41.8%z 3.26 - 42
41.6%z 3.25 - 43
41.6%z 3.25 - 44
41.6%z 3.25 - 45
41.5%z 3.24 - 46
41.3%z 3.23 - 47
41.2%z 3.22 - 48
40.9%z 3.21 - 49
40.8%z 3.20 - 50
40.8%z 3.20