Hannibal Buress: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
86.2%z 4.52 - 2
68.2%z 3.89 - 3
59.4%z 3.79 - 4
56.3%z 3.76 - 5
47.3%z 3.62 - 6
46.7%z 3.58 - 7
46.5%z 3.57 - 8
44.1%z 3.41 - 9
43.6%z 3.38 - 10
43.6%z 3.38 - 11
42.8%z 3.33 - 12
42.5%z 3.31 - 13
42.5%z 3.31 - 14
42.4%z 3.30 - 15
42.3%z 3.30 - 16
42.2%z 3.29 - 17
41.4%z 3.24 - 18
41%z 3.22 - 19
41%z 3.21 - 20
41%z 3.21 - 21
40.7%z 3.20 - 22
40%z 3.15 - 23
39.9%z 3.14 - 24
39.9%z 3.14 - 25
39.5%z 3.12 - 26
39.4%z 3.11 - 27
39.4%z 3.11 - 28
39.2%z 3.10 - 29
39.2%z 3.10 - 30
39%z 3.08 - 31
38.9%z 3.08 - 32
38.7%z 3.07 - 33
38.7%z 3.06 - 34
38.5%z 3.05 - 35
38.4%z 3.05 - 36
38.2%z 3.03 - 37
38%z 3.02 - 38
37.9%z 3.01 - 39
37.7%z 3.00 - 40
37.6%z 2.99 - 41
37.5%z 2.99 - 42
37.5%z 2.99 - 43
37.5%z 2.99 - 44
37.5%z 2.99 - 45
37.3%z 2.98 - 46
37.1%z 2.96 - 47
37.1%z 2.96 - 48
36.9%z 2.95 - 49
36.1%z 2.90 - 50
35.8%z 2.87