Hilton Armstrong: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
80.9%z 4.09 - 2
80.1%z 4.03 - 3
63.1%z 3.83 - 4
56.2%z 3.76 - 5
52.4%z 3.72 - 6
47.1%z 3.61 - 7
47%z 3.60 - 8
47%z 3.60 - 9
46.9%z 3.60 - 10
46.8%z 3.59 - 11
46.3%z 3.55 - 12
44.8%z 3.46 - 13
44.6%z 3.44 - 14
44.6%z 3.44 - 15
44.4%z 3.44 - 16
44.1%z 3.41 - 17
43.7%z 3.39 - 18
43.6%z 3.38 - 19
43.4%z 3.37 - 20
43.2%z 3.36 - 21
43.2%z 3.35 - 22
42.9%z 3.34 - 23
42.7%z 3.33 - 24
42.5%z 3.31 - 25
42.2%z 3.29 - 26
41.7%z 3.26 - 27
41.7%z 3.26 - 28
40.9%z 3.20 - 29
40.8%z 3.20 - 30
40.6%z 3.19 - 31
40.1%z 3.15 - 32
39.8%z 3.14 - 33
39.7%z 3.13 - 34
39.6%z 3.13 - 35
39.2%z 3.09 - 36
39.1%z 3.09 - 37
39%z 3.08 - 38
38.9%z 3.08 - 39
38.9%z 3.08 - 40
38.7%z 3.06 - 41
38.6%z 3.06 - 42
38.4%z 3.04 - 43
37.8%z 3.00 - 44
37.7%z 3.00 - 45
37.5%z 2.98 - 46
37.3%z 2.97 - 47
37.2%z 2.97 - 48
37.2%z 2.97 - 49
37%z 2.95 - 50
36.9%z 2.95