Hugh Dancy: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
89.9%z 4.82 - 2
89.3%z 4.78 - 3
88.2%z 4.68 - 4
86.4%z 4.54 - 5
85.9%z 4.50 - 6
83.3%z 4.29 - 7
82.5%z 4.22 - 8
79.9%z 4.02 - 9
70.1%z 3.91 - 10
65.8%z 3.86 - 11
63%z 3.83 - 12
60.9%z 3.81 - 13
60.8%z 3.81 - 14
60.7%z 3.81 - 15
57.4%z 3.77 - 16
48.9%z 3.68 - 17
48.2%z 3.67 - 18
47.8%z 3.65 - 19
47.5%z 3.64 - 20
47.2%z 3.62 - 21
46.9%z 3.59 - 22
46.7%z 3.58 - 23
46.4%z 3.56 - 24
46.3%z 3.56 - 25
46.2%z 3.55 - 26
46.2%z 3.55 - 27
45.8%z 3.53 - 28
45.8%z 3.52 - 29
45.6%z 3.51 - 30
45.2%z 3.48 - 3144.5%z 3.44
- 32
44.4%z 3.43 - 33
44.2%z 3.42 - 34
44.2%z 3.42 - 35
43.8%z 3.39 - 36
43.6%z 3.38 - 37
43.5%z 3.37 - 38
43.4%z 3.37 - 39
43.2%z 3.36 - 40
43.1%z 3.35 - 41
43%z 3.35 - 42
43%z 3.35 - 43
43%z 3.34 - 44
43%z 3.34 - 45
42.9%z 3.34 - 46
42.9%z 3.34 - 47
42.9%z 3.34 - 48
42.8%z 3.33 - 49
42.6%z 3.32 - 50
42.5%z 3.31