Hugh Griffith: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
88.7%z 4.73 - 2
86.7%z 4.56 - 3
83.2%z 4.28 - 4
80.8%z 4.08 - 5
79.9%z 4.02 - 6
74%z 3.95 - 7
72.1%z 3.93 - 8
62.9%z 3.83 - 9
62.7%z 3.83 - 10
56.8%z 3.76 - 11
56.6%z 3.76 - 12
55.7%z 3.75 - 13
47.1%z 3.61 - 14
46.2%z 3.55 - 15
46.1%z 3.54 - 16
45.2%z 3.48 - 17
45.1%z 3.48 - 18
45.1%z 3.48 - 19
44.9%z 3.47 - 2044.1%z 3.41
- 21
43.1%z 3.35 - 22
42.9%z 3.33 - 23
42.5%z 3.31 - 24
42.4%z 3.30 - 25
42.3%z 3.30 - 26
41.7%z 3.26 - 27
41.5%z 3.25 - 28
41.2%z 3.23 - 29
41.1%z 3.22 - 30
40.3%z 3.17 - 31
39.8%z 3.14 - 32
39.7%z 3.13 - 33
39.6%z 3.12 - 34
39.4%z 3.11 - 35
39.3%z 3.10 - 36
39%z 3.08 - 37
38.9%z 3.08 - 38
38.8%z 3.07 - 39
38.8%z 3.07 - 40
38.7%z 3.06 - 41
38.7%z 3.06 - 42
38.6%z 3.06 - 43
38.3%z 3.04 - 44
38.2%z 3.03 - 45
38.1%z 3.02 - 46
38%z 3.02 - 47
37.9%z 3.01 - 48
37.8%z 3.01 - 49
37.7%z 3.00 - 50
37.6%z 2.99