Hunter Armstrong: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81.2%z 4.12 - 2
74.2%z 3.95 - 3
45.4%z 3.50 - 4
45.2%z 3.49 - 5
45%z 3.47 - 6
43.9%z 3.40 - 7
43.8%z 3.39 - 8
43.6%z 3.38 - 9
43.5%z 3.37 - 10
42.8%z 3.33 - 11
42.7%z 3.32 - 12
42.6%z 3.32 - 13
41.8%z 3.27 - 14
41.4%z 3.24 - 15
41.2%z 3.22 - 16
41%z 3.21 - 17
40.7%z 3.20 - 18
40.1%z 3.15 - 19
40%z 3.15 - 20
40%z 3.15 - 21
39.5%z 3.12 - 22
39.4%z 3.11 - 23
39.1%z 3.09 - 24
38.8%z 3.07 - 25
38.6%z 3.05 - 26
38.5%z 3.05 - 27
38.4%z 3.04 - 28
37.9%z 3.01 - 29
37.9%z 3.01 - 30
37.7%z 3.00 - 31
37.6%z 2.99 - 32
37.5%z 2.99 - 33
37.4%z 2.98 - 34
37.4%z 2.98 - 35
37.4%z 2.98 - 36
37.2%z 2.97 - 37
37%z 2.95 - 38
36.6%z 2.92 - 39
36.5%z 2.92 - 40
35.8%z 2.88 - 41
35.8%z 2.88 - 42
35.7%z 2.87 - 43
35.5%z 2.86 - 44
35.5%z 2.85 - 45
35.3%z 2.84 - 46
35.2%z 2.84 - 47
35%z 2.82 - 48
34.9%z 2.82 - 49
34.9%z 2.82 - 50
34.8%z 2.81