Irma Thomas: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
94.1%z 5.61 - 2
89.7%z 4.81 - 3
86.9%z 4.58 - 4
84.6%z 4.39 - 5
83.1%z 4.27 - 6
82.3%z 4.20 - 7
80.6%z 4.06 - 8
57.7%z 3.77 - 9
55.4%z 3.75 - 10
48.5%z 3.67 - 11
47.8%z 3.65 - 12
46.9%z 3.60 - 13
46.8%z 3.59 - 14
45.7%z 3.52 - 15
45.6%z 3.51 - 16
44.7%z 3.46 - 17
44.2%z 3.42 - 18
43.6%z 3.38 - 19
43.2%z 3.36 - 20
42.5%z 3.31 - 21
42.3%z 3.30 - 22
42%z 3.28 - 23
42%z 3.28 - 24
41.7%z 3.26 - 25
41.7%z 3.26 - 26
41.6%z 3.25 - 27
41.6%z 3.25 - 28
41.1%z 3.22 - 29
41.1%z 3.22 - 30
40.6%z 3.19 - 31
40.5%z 3.18 - 32
40.1%z 3.15 - 33
39.5%z 3.11 - 34
39.4%z 3.11 - 35
39.4%z 3.11 - 36
39.3%z 3.10 - 37
39.3%z 3.10 - 38
39.2%z 3.10 - 39
39%z 3.08 - 40
38.9%z 3.07 - 41
38.8%z 3.07 - 42
38.7%z 3.06 - 43
38.6%z 3.06 - 44
38.6%z 3.06 - 45
38.6%z 3.06 - 46
38.2%z 3.03 - 47
38%z 3.02 - 48
38%z 3.02 - 49
37.9%z 3.01 - 50
37.6%z 2.99