Jimmy Pursey: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
89.4%z 4.79 - 2
87.8%z 4.65 - 3
83.7%z 4.32 - 4
76.9%z 3.98 - 5
72.2%z 3.93 - 6
53.9%z 3.73 - 7
52.7%z 3.72 - 8
49.5%z 3.68 - 9
45.8%z 3.52 - 10
45.7%z 3.52 - 11
45.3%z 3.49 - 12
44.1%z 3.41 - 13
43.3%z 3.36 - 14
43.1%z 3.35 - 15
42.9%z 3.34 - 16
42.7%z 3.32 - 17
42.6%z 3.32 - 18
42.5%z 3.31 - 19
42.3%z 3.30 - 20
41.8%z 3.27 - 21
41.6%z 3.25 - 22
41.5%z 3.24 - 23
41.4%z 3.24 - 24
41.3%z 3.23 - 25
40.6%z 3.19 - 26
40.2%z 3.16 - 27
40.2%z 3.16 - 28
39.9%z 3.14 - 29
39.7%z 3.13 - 30
39.4%z 3.11 - 31
39.1%z 3.09 - 32
39.1%z 3.09 - 33
38.6%z 3.06 - 34
38.2%z 3.03 - 3538.2%z 3.03
- 3638%z 3.02
- 37
38%z 3.02 - 38
37.6%z 2.99 - 39
37.6%z 2.99 - 40
37.5%z 2.99 - 41
37.4%z 2.98 - 42
36.9%z 2.95 - 43
36.9%z 2.95 - 44
36.2%z 2.90 - 45
36%z 2.89 - 46
36%z 2.89 - 47
35.9%z 2.88 - 48
35.7%z 2.87 - 49
35.6%z 2.86 - 50
35.5%z 2.86