Jin Dogg: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
92.2%z 5.24 - 2
88.4%z 4.70 - 3
88%z 4.67 - 4
88%z 4.67 - 5
87.3%z 4.61 - 6
83.4%z 4.29 - 7
82.7%z 4.23 - 8
82.6%z 4.23 - 9
81.6%z 4.15 - 10
81.3%z 4.12 - 11
81.3%z 4.12 - 12
80%z 4.02 - 13
77.5%z 3.99 - 14
77%z 3.98 - 15
76.9%z 3.98 - 16
73.2%z 3.94 - 17
71.4%z 3.92 - 18
67.8%z 3.88 - 19
65.2%z 3.85 - 20
64.3%z 3.85 - 21
63.4%z 3.83 - 22
62%z 3.82 - 23
60.5%z 3.80 - 24
60.2%z 3.80 - 25
59.7%z 3.79 - 26
56.7%z 3.76 - 27
54.5%z 3.74 - 28
53.7%z 3.73 - 29
53.3%z 3.72 - 30
52.6%z 3.72 - 31
48.8%z 3.68 - 32
47.7%z 3.65 - 33
47.7%z 3.65 - 34
47.7%z 3.64 - 35
47.3%z 3.62 - 36
46.9%z 3.59 - 37
46.5%z 3.57 - 38
46.3%z 3.56 - 39
46%z 3.53 - 40
45.9%z 3.53 - 41
45.8%z 3.52 - 42
45.8%z 3.52 - 43
45.6%z 3.51 - 44
45.6%z 3.51 - 45
44.9%z 3.47 - 46
44.7%z 3.45 - 47
44.6%z 3.44 - 48
44.5%z 3.44 - 49
44.5%z 3.44 - 50
44.1%z 3.42