John M. Ackerman: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
91.1%z 5.05 - 2
85.2%z 4.44 - 3
83.4%z 4.30 - 4
71.5%z 3.92 - 5
49.2%z 3.68 - 6
48.7%z 3.67 - 7
47.4%z 3.63 - 8
46.9%z 3.59 - 9
45.8%z 3.52 - 10
45.2%z 3.49 - 11
44.8%z 3.46 - 12
44.5%z 3.44 - 13
43.9%z 3.40 - 14
43.4%z 3.37 - 15
42.6%z 3.31 - 16
42.3%z 3.30 - 17
42.2%z 3.29 - 18
41.7%z 3.26 - 19
41.5%z 3.25 - 20
41.5%z 3.25 - 21
41%z 3.21 - 22
40.9%z 3.21 - 23
40.8%z 3.20 - 24
40.6%z 3.19 - 25
40.3%z 3.17 - 26
39.8%z 3.14 - 27
39.7%z 3.13 - 28
39.5%z 3.12 - 29
39.5%z 3.12 - 30
39.5%z 3.12 - 31
39.2%z 3.10 - 32
38.8%z 3.07 - 33
38.6%z 3.06 - 34
38.6%z 3.06 - 35
38.5%z 3.05 - 36
38.4%z 3.05 - 37
38.4%z 3.04 - 38
38.3%z 3.04 - 39
38.1%z 3.03 - 40
38.1%z 3.02 - 41
38.1%z 3.02 - 42
38%z 3.02 - 43
38%z 3.02 - 44
37.9%z 3.01 - 45
37.8%z 3.01 - 46
37.8%z 3.00 - 47
37.8%z 3.00 - 48
37.8%z 3.00 - 49
37.7%z 3.00 - 50
37.7%z 3.00