Julian Love: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
91.1%z 5.05 - 2
87.6%z 4.64 - 3
59.3%z 3.79 - 4
52.7%z 3.72 - 5
47.3%z 3.62 - 6
43.9%z 3.40 - 7
43.7%z 3.39 - 8
43.3%z 3.36 - 9
43.2%z 3.36 - 10
42.8%z 3.33 - 11
42.6%z 3.32 - 12
42.1%z 3.28 - 13
41.8%z 3.27 - 14
41.7%z 3.26 - 15
41.5%z 3.24 - 16
41.2%z 3.23 - 17
40%z 3.14 - 18
39.8%z 3.14 - 19
39.8%z 3.14 - 20
38.9%z 3.08 - 21
38.6%z 3.06 - 22
38.4%z 3.05 - 23
38.1%z 3.02 - 24
38%z 3.02 - 25
37.7%z 3.00 - 26
37.7%z 3.00 - 27
37.6%z 2.99 - 28
37.2%z 2.97 - 29
37.2%z 2.96 - 30
36.9%z 2.95 - 31
36.9%z 2.94 - 32
36.8%z 2.94 - 33
36.8%z 2.94 - 34
36.8%z 2.94 - 35
36.7%z 2.94 - 36
36.6%z 2.93 - 37
36.5%z 2.92 - 38
36.5%z 2.92 - 39
36.4%z 2.92 - 40
36.3%z 2.91 - 41
36.1%z 2.89 - 42
36%z 2.89 - 43
36%z 2.89 - 44
35.9%z 2.88 - 45
35.9%z 2.88 - 46
35.8%z 2.88 - 47
35.7%z 2.87 - 48
35.6%z 2.87 - 49
35.3%z 2.85 - 50
35.1%z 2.83