Julius Hodge: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
86.1%z 4.51 - 2
49.6%z 3.68 - 3
47.9%z 3.66 - 4
45.5%z 3.50 - 5
44.8%z 3.46 - 6
44.4%z 3.44 - 7
43.8%z 3.40 - 8
42.8%z 3.33 - 9
41.1%z 3.22 - 10
39.7%z 3.13 - 11
39.5%z 3.12 - 12
39.3%z 3.10 - 13
39.1%z 3.09 - 14
38.6%z 3.05 - 15
38.4%z 3.05 - 16
37.9%z 3.01 - 17
37.8%z 3.01 - 18
37.8%z 3.00 - 19
37.7%z 3.00 - 20
36.6%z 2.93 - 21
36.2%z 2.90 - 22
35.8%z 2.88 - 23
35.8%z 2.87 - 24
35.7%z 2.87 - 25
35.7%z 2.87 - 26
35.5%z 2.85 - 27
35.4%z 2.85 - 28
35.1%z 2.83 - 29
35%z 2.83 - 30
34.8%z 2.81 - 31
34.6%z 2.80 - 32
34.2%z 2.78 - 33
34%z 2.76 - 34
34%z 2.76 - 35
33.8%z 2.75 - 36
33.7%z 2.74 - 37
33.7%z 2.74 - 38
33.6%z 2.73 - 39
33.5%z 2.73 - 40
33.5%z 2.73 - 41
33.3%z 2.72 - 42
33.2%z 2.70 - 43
33.1%z 2.70 - 44
33.1%z 2.70 - 45
32.9%z 2.68 - 46
32.7%z 2.67 - 47
32.6%z 2.67 - 48
32.5%z 2.67 - 49
32.4%z 2.66 - 50
32.4%z 2.66