Junior Bridgeman: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
91.7%z 5.15 - 2
90.6%z 4.94 - 3
80.9%z 4.09 - 4
78.8%z 4.00 - 5
78.7%z 4.00 - 6
76.4%z 3.98 - 7
74.9%z 3.96 - 8
59%z 3.79 - 9
58.9%z 3.79 - 10
57.9%z 3.77 - 11
57.8%z 3.77 - 12
54.7%z 3.74 - 13
49.1%z 3.68 - 14
47.9%z 3.66 - 15
47.6%z 3.64 - 16
47%z 3.60 - 17
46.9%z 3.60 - 18
46.9%z 3.59 - 19
46.6%z 3.58 - 20
45.6%z 3.51 - 21
44.9%z 3.47 - 22
44.9%z 3.46 - 23
44.7%z 3.45 - 24
44.7%z 3.45 - 25
44.6%z 3.45 - 26
44.5%z 3.44 - 27
44.3%z 3.43 - 28
44.2%z 3.42 - 29
43.6%z 3.38 - 30
43.4%z 3.37 - 31
43.3%z 3.36 - 32
42.8%z 3.33 - 33
42.6%z 3.32 - 34
42.1%z 3.28 - 35
41.3%z 3.23 - 36
41.1%z 3.22 - 37
41%z 3.21 - 38
40.8%z 3.20 - 39
40.5%z 3.18 - 40
40.1%z 3.15 - 41
40%z 3.15 - 42
40%z 3.15 - 43
39.9%z 3.14 - 44
39.5%z 3.12 - 45
39.4%z 3.11 - 46
39.3%z 3.10 - 47
39.2%z 3.10 - 48
38.9%z 3.08 - 49
38.9%z 3.08 - 50
38.7%z 3.06