Kemp Muhl: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
86.3%z 4.53 - 2
84.4%z 4.37 - 3
83.6%z 4.31 - 4
82.8%z 4.24 - 5
81.8%z 4.17 - 6
80%z 4.02 - 7
74.9%z 3.96 - 8
65.8%z 3.86 - 9
61.2%z 3.81 - 10
56.2%z 3.76 - 11
56%z 3.75 - 12
55.2%z 3.75 - 13
55.2%z 3.74 - 14
50%z 3.69 - 15
49.6%z 3.68 - 16
47.9%z 3.66 - 17
47.5%z 3.64 - 18
47.2%z 3.62 - 19
47%z 3.60 - 20
46.9%z 3.60 - 21
46.3%z 3.56 - 22
46.3%z 3.56 - 23
45.8%z 3.53 - 24
45.3%z 3.49 - 25
45%z 3.47 - 26
44.8%z 3.46 - 27
44.1%z 3.41 - 28
44%z 3.41 - 29
43.7%z 3.39 - 30
43.3%z 3.36 - 31
43.2%z 3.36 - 32
43.1%z 3.35 - 33
43%z 3.34 - 34
43%z 3.34 - 35
42.8%z 3.33 - 36
42.4%z 3.30 - 37
42.3%z 3.30 - 38
41.9%z 3.27 - 39
41.9%z 3.27 - 40
41.8%z 3.27 - 41
41.5%z 3.24 - 42
40.9%z 3.21 - 43
40.8%z 3.20 - 44
40.8%z 3.20 - 45
40.7%z 3.19 - 46
40.5%z 3.18 - 47
40.5%z 3.18 - 48
40.5%z 3.18 - 49
40.3%z 3.17 - 50
40.2%z 3.16