Kim Darby: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
84.1%z 4.36 - 2
81.7%z 4.16 - 3
62.2%z 3.82 - 4
58%z 3.78 - 5
55.4%z 3.75 - 6
47.9%z 3.66 - 7
47.8%z 3.66 - 8
47.7%z 3.65 - 9
47.5%z 3.64 - 10
46.9%z 3.60 - 11
45.9%z 3.53 - 12
45.2%z 3.48 - 13
44.2%z 3.42 - 14
44%z 3.40 - 15
43.7%z 3.39 - 16
43.3%z 3.36 - 17
43.1%z 3.35 - 18
42.9%z 3.33 - 19
42.6%z 3.32 - 20
42.5%z 3.31 - 21
42.3%z 3.30 - 22
42.3%z 3.30 - 23
42%z 3.28 - 24
41.9%z 3.27 - 25
41.7%z 3.26 - 26
41.6%z 3.25 - 27
41.4%z 3.24 - 28
41.3%z 3.24 - 29
41.3%z 3.23 - 30
41.2%z 3.23 - 31
40.9%z 3.21 - 32
40.9%z 3.21 - 33
40.5%z 3.18 - 34
40.4%z 3.18 - 35
40.2%z 3.16 - 36
39.9%z 3.14 - 37
39.9%z 3.14 - 38
39.8%z 3.13 - 39
39.5%z 3.12 - 40
39.4%z 3.11 - 41
39.3%z 3.10 - 42
39.3%z 3.10 - 43
39.2%z 3.10 - 44
39.2%z 3.10 - 45
39.2%z 3.09 - 46
39%z 3.09 - 47
39%z 3.08 - 48
38.9%z 3.08 - 49
38.9%z 3.08 - 50
38.7%z 3.06