Kim Dickens: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
86.6%z 4.55 - 2
84.6%z 4.39 - 3
82.5%z 4.22 - 4
77.5%z 3.99 - 5
71.7%z 3.93 - 6
71.7%z 3.93 - 7
70.6%z 3.91 - 8
67.1%z 3.88 - 9
57.7%z 3.77 - 10
56.5%z 3.76 - 11
54.8%z 3.74 - 12
50.7%z 3.70 - 13
50.6%z 3.70 - 14
48%z 3.66 - 15
47.6%z 3.64 - 16
47.6%z 3.64 - 17
46.8%z 3.59 - 18
46.5%z 3.57 - 19
46%z 3.54 - 20
44.3%z 3.42 - 21
43.5%z 3.38 - 22
43.3%z 3.36 - 23
43.2%z 3.36 - 24
43%z 3.34 - 25
42.7%z 3.32 - 26
42.5%z 3.31 - 27
42.3%z 3.30 - 28
42.2%z 3.29 - 29
41.9%z 3.27 - 30
41.9%z 3.27 - 31
41.6%z 3.25 - 32
41.5%z 3.24 - 33
41.5%z 3.24 - 34
41.4%z 3.24 - 35
41.2%z 3.23 - 36
40.5%z 3.18 - 37
40.4%z 3.18 - 38
40.4%z 3.17 - 39
40.3%z 3.17 - 40
40.3%z 3.17 - 41
40.2%z 3.16 - 42
40.1%z 3.16 - 43
40%z 3.15 - 44
39.9%z 3.14 - 45
39.2%z 3.10 - 46
39.2%z 3.09 - 47
39.2%z 3.09 - 48
38.7%z 3.06 - 49
38.6%z 3.06 - 50
38.4%z 3.05