Kim Do-ah: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
94.1%z 5.61 - 2
92.1%z 5.23 - 3
91.6%z 5.14 - 4
90.9%z 5.01 - 5
90.9%z 5.00 - 6
90.8%z 4.99 - 7
88%z 4.67 - 8
87.1%z 4.60 - 9
87.1%z 4.59 - 10
87%z 4.59 - 11
86.8%z 4.57 - 12
86.6%z 4.56 - 13
86.3%z 4.53 - 14
85.9%z 4.50 - 15
85.9%z 4.50 - 16
85.2%z 4.44 - 17
85.1%z 4.43 - 18
85%z 4.42 - 19
84.7%z 4.40 - 20
84.3%z 4.37 - 21
84.2%z 4.36 - 22
83.8%z 4.32 - 23
83.4%z 4.30 - 24
83.2%z 4.28 - 25
82.8%z 4.24 - 26
82.5%z 4.22 - 27
81.9%z 4.17 - 28
81.9%z 4.17 - 29
81.5%z 4.14 - 30
80.9%z 4.09 - 31
80.6%z 4.06 - 32
80.3%z 4.04 - 33
80.2%z 4.03 - 34
78.6%z 4.00 - 35
75.6%z 3.97 - 36
74.3%z 3.95 - 37
73.3%z 3.94 - 38
72.1%z 3.93 - 39
71.3%z 3.92 - 40
64.2%z 3.84 - 41
63.3%z 3.83 - 42
63.2%z 3.83 - 43
61.8%z 3.82 - 44
61.4%z 3.81 - 45
60.5%z 3.80 - 46
57.6%z 3.77 - 47
57%z 3.76 - 48
56.7%z 3.76 - 49
54.7%z 3.74 - 50
53%z 3.72