King Lam: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
90.8%z 4.98 - 2
89.5%z 4.79 - 3
88.5%z 4.71 - 4
86.5%z 4.55 - 5
85.5%z 4.46 - 6
85.2%z 4.44 - 7
84.9%z 4.42 - 8
84.6%z 4.39 - 9
84.2%z 4.36 - 10
82.9%z 4.25 - 11
82.8%z 4.25 - 12
82.6%z 4.23 - 13
81.9%z 4.17 - 14
81.6%z 4.15 - 15
80.3%z 4.04 - 16
72.6%z 3.94 - 17
71.9%z 3.93 - 18
62.5%z 3.82 - 19
60.4%z 3.80 - 20
59.3%z 3.79 - 21
57.1%z 3.77 - 22
54.6%z 3.74 - 23
52.3%z 3.71 - 24
48.4%z 3.67 - 25
47.9%z 3.66 - 26
47.2%z 3.61 - 27
47.1%z 3.61 - 28
46.9%z 3.60 - 29
46.5%z 3.57 - 30
46.4%z 3.56 - 31
46.2%z 3.55 - 32
46.1%z 3.54 - 33
46%z 3.54 - 34
45.8%z 3.52 - 35
45.8%z 3.52 - 36
45.6%z 3.51 - 37
45.4%z 3.50 - 38
45.3%z 3.49 - 39
45.3%z 3.49 - 40
45.2%z 3.49 - 41
45%z 3.47 - 42
44.6%z 3.44 - 43
44.5%z 3.44 - 44
44.2%z 3.42 - 45
43.8%z 3.40 - 46
43.7%z 3.39 - 47
43.5%z 3.38 - 48
43.5%z 3.38 - 49
43.5%z 3.38 - 50
43.4%z 3.37