Klaus Bondam: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.6%z 4.63 - 2
83.5%z 4.30 - 3
83.3%z 4.29 - 4
81.6%z 4.14 - 5
80.2%z 4.03 - 6
75.4%z 3.97 - 7
74.3%z 3.95 - 8
71.1%z 3.92 - 9
70.5%z 3.91 - 10
67.4%z 3.88 - 11
66.6%z 3.87 - 12
58.5%z 3.78 - 13
55.9%z 3.75 - 14
48.8%z 3.68 - 15
48%z 3.67 - 16
47.5%z 3.63 - 17
46.7%z 3.58 - 18
45.8%z 3.53 - 19
45.3%z 3.49 - 20
44.3%z 3.43 - 21
44.2%z 3.42 - 22
43.8%z 3.39 - 23
43.7%z 3.39 - 24
43.6%z 3.38 - 25
43.4%z 3.37 - 26
43.3%z 3.36 - 27
43.2%z 3.36 - 28
42.8%z 3.33 - 29
42.5%z 3.31 - 30
42.4%z 3.31 - 31
42.2%z 3.29 - 32
41.6%z 3.25 - 33
41.5%z 3.24 - 34
40.7%z 3.19 - 35
40.1%z 3.15 - 36
39.9%z 3.14 - 37
39.9%z 3.14 - 38
39.9%z 3.14 - 39
39.5%z 3.12 - 40
39.2%z 3.10 - 41
39%z 3.08 - 42
38.9%z 3.08 - 43
38.9%z 3.08 - 44
38.9%z 3.07 - 45
38.8%z 3.07 - 46
38.7%z 3.06 - 47
38.3%z 3.04 - 48
37.9%z 3.01 - 49
37.8%z 3.00 - 50
37.7%z 3.00