Kym Marsh: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
83%z 4.26 - 2
82.7%z 4.24 - 3
82.6%z 4.23 - 4
82.5%z 4.22 - 5
80.3%z 4.04 - 6
80%z 4.02 - 7
63.3%z 3.83 - 8
51.6%z 3.71 - 9
50.3%z 3.69 - 10
47.4%z 3.62 - 11
47.2%z 3.61 - 12
46.3%z 3.56 - 13
46.1%z 3.55 - 14
45.5%z 3.51 - 15
45.4%z 3.50 - 16
45.4%z 3.50 - 17
44.9%z 3.47 - 18
44.8%z 3.46 - 19
44.7%z 3.45 - 20
44.4%z 3.43 - 21
44.3%z 3.43 - 22
44.2%z 3.42 - 23
43.8%z 3.40 - 24
43.8%z 3.39 - 25
43.5%z 3.38 - 26
43.2%z 3.36 - 27
42.5%z 3.31 - 28
42.2%z 3.29 - 29
42.1%z 3.28 - 30
42%z 3.28 - 31
41.9%z 3.27 - 32
41.6%z 3.25 - 33
41.4%z 3.24 - 34
41.3%z 3.23 - 35
41%z 3.21 - 36
41%z 3.21 - 37
40.6%z 3.19 - 38
40.2%z 3.16 - 39
40.2%z 3.16 - 40
39.9%z 3.14 - 41
39.7%z 3.13 - 42
39.7%z 3.13 - 43
39.5%z 3.11 - 44
39.3%z 3.10 - 45
39.3%z 3.10 - 46
39.2%z 3.10 - 47
39.2%z 3.10 - 48
38.9%z 3.08 - 49
38.9%z 3.07 - 50
38.9%z 3.07